On 2010-04-27 05:05, Aja wrote:
I think your two phases consideration is correct.
For ordinary Japanese rules when ignoring details.
Whatever we do to the Chinese scoring,
it should be equivalent to the Japanese scoring, except the special cases
of seki.
Plus-minus 1 point and if the territory boundaries are already fixed and
except for other special (ko) cases!
Also do not forget numbers of removed stones and of placed stones
(alternatively: differences of passes / tenukis) inside a local region.
Only then you get the obvious local missing score changes proven in
general by Berlekamp and me.
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your opinion. My approach has already considered plus-minus 1 and
differences of passes, but only globally rather than locally. I wonder do
you think it is OK?
Aja
--
robert jasiek
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
