> From: Darren Cook <[email protected]> > >> How much [effort] to determine whether there are multiple peaks? <snippage>
>> Now the tough question: How can this information be used to improve move > selection? > > One approach, not at all sophisticated, is better time management: spend > less time on normal distributions, more time when the distribution is > messy. (But I wonder if more time will just make the two peaks stand > out more?) If "more time" means "more of the same simulations", it might simply lead to filling in the details; the peaks exist (hypothetically) because the playouts are doing something non-optimal. I wonder if post-game review can focus on such positions and learn something which would optimize the playouts. If such meta-analysis is quick enough, it could be done during the game itself. _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
