> In our current research, we are exploring a team of diverse Computer Go > players that vote together at each step of 9x9 games. We are using Fuego, > GnuGo, Pachi and MoGo. We show in our work that a diverse team of players > can play better than the best player, ... > http://teamcore.usc.edu/papers/2013/ijcai13.pdf
Thanks, I enjoyed your paper. Sorry citing my paper seemed to be a curse ;-) And kudos for managing to cite a 1785 paper: that theorem, phrased like that, was new to me, but it is of course a very important concept. I just had a bit of trouble understanding the results. At the start of the paper I think it said each team would be playing against Fuego. But in your results your best team barely manages 50%. Then I noticed Fuego was in there too, with a 30-40% win rate. So you did round-robin? (As an aside on data presentation: I'd have preferred a table than a chart. But if sticking with a chart, some horizontal lines would have helped.) Darren -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles) _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
