If using more easily used metadata makes pages searchable and easier to find, and is easy to code, why not? I think this has been used for several years. Tagging has been made more straightforward, now that it's implemented in blogs, rss pages, in fields, instead of at the coding level.

Isn't this similar to the tagging that Tom has been talking about?

Have any of you been using or reading about this:  http://gmpg.org/xfn/?

Some explanation and resource links are here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML_Friends_Network

If you have been studying this, what do you see as the value, the uses, the advantages/disadvantages, etc.


************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to