The different versions have different capabilities that have nothing to do with running them in virtualization nor anything to do with what MS gives as a reason for not wanting someone to run them in VM. Running basic in VM doesn't not 'enable' anything in basic. All versions run as is out of the box in VM, for whatever reason MS has decided they only want you to run the more expensive version in VM. It's their product they can decide they only want you to run basic on Tuesdays after 2.27pm.
What is the consequence if I do run basic in VM? Maybe we should ask the editors of Macworld who wrote an article about loading home on VM? http://www.macworld.com/2007/02/firstlooks/vistamac/index.php Mike On 6/1/07, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Returning to the specifics of the EULA: There are several versions of the product selling at different prices. The different versions have different capabilities. You want the capabilities of the more expensive version, but don't want to pay more. So you buy the less expensive version and enable some of the capabilities you did not pay for. Is this wrong, you bet it is. Is there a consequence, you bet there is.
************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
