On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:37:23 -0400, "Chris Dunford"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> <You know that eventually they will make it impossible for you to stay
> with XP>

    How can Vista be any good if it takes more hardware to run that XP?
 I would bet that most programs will run much faster in XP. I have a
 133mh 
 Win98se machine just back from the shop and an almost new Acer 2gh XP
 machine. 
 The 98 machine takes a really long time to boot and a moderate time to
 shut 
 down. However, several programs start faster on the 98 machine and do
 simple tasks
 much faster than the XP machine! Bloat,bloat,bloat or simply M$.    
Be at Peace.


************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to