I think in the end, if Apple started allowing os x on non apple x86 hardware they would gain maketshare and not commit suicide as you put it. I know many who would not spend the money to buy apple hardware to get the os, but if I could buy the os and put it on my hardware I'd do it in a second. If nothing else, Apple could release a product list of motherboards etc that would be supported, or for that matter simply say if you put our os on your hardware it's not supported at all.
Mike On Feb 1, 2008 7:26 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Apple has actually gone a long way towards supporting virtualization, but > to critique them for not wishing to commit suicide is just the rantings > of MS fan boys. > > ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
