Well, I'm glad you didn't mistakenly think anyone said you HAD to do it the right way! :)
But after all this time, one might think you'd have learned all about email filters. This type of thing is what they're for. Strangely, now that I get my email via gmail's AJAX web interface, I've sort of had to unlearn filters, since they instead offer these newfangled 'labels'. Ah well. Maybe I'll go back to using an old local email client with no filters at all. Or not. On Feb 19, 2008 9:05 PM, John A. Newitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:59 AM -0500 2/19/08, Tony B wrote: > > >Firstly, make sure you aren't subscribed to the digest. It makes no > >sense to subscribe to a digest (that combines messages) and then break > >the messages apart later. You are not saving bandwidth or anything, > >you're only delaying delivery, making timely participation impossible. > >Not to mention adding a whole layer of unnecessary complexity. > > That's what makes the USA great. I don't have to do it the way Tony > sez. I like getting it as a digest. I don't read them until later at > night or days later, so timeliness is not an issue for me anyway. I > only occasionally post to the list, and I don't need to be the first > one with a snappy come-back to a post. I started doing it this way > long ago shortly after I first subscribed to Computerguys-L. There > were a lot of posts, and having them constantly coming in each time I > checked my mail and mixing with my work email was too distracting. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
