You never answered my query. No I'm not offended at all, not even a little, not sure why you took that direction except to exaggerate your point. As to 'great' software, this is dubious at best, I mean really....ANOTHER browser on windows? Safari is hardly used on macs let alone another platform. If apple wants to communicate why not do it the normal expected way via email? I already said no to them that time, now I have to do it again? An updater is not for communication, it's for updating, I'm just commenting it would be nice if they listened. Why bother asking for my email if they are going to use the updater to 'communicate' ?
Mike On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >How about an updater that just checks the software installed? Firefox > >doesn't push out extensions you don't already have...does adobe ask you > to > >update programs you don't have? Your logic is, MS does it so it's ok? > Odd > >Thomas. > > Let's see if I understand you fully. You are offended because a company > has offered to give you some great software for free? > > This company is already communicating with you about some other free > software that you got from them. When as part of communicating with you > about that software they say: by the way, you might also be interested in > this other thing we can give you for free they have somehow in your mind > crossed the line? > > Have I got that right? > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
