>If apple wants to communicate why not do it the normal expected way via >email? I already said no to them that time, now I have to do it again? >An updater is not for communication, it's for updating, I'm just >commenting it would be nice if they listened. Why bother asking for my >email if they are going to use the updater to 'communicate' ?
You really think spam is better? Don't we constantly warn people not to download and install software offered to then in email? I think the updater route is better, safer, and much more efficient. If someone at dinner asks you more than once if you want a second slice of apple pie do you slam the table and storm off in a huff? You objection seems petulant to me. Should Apple be required to keep a database of refusenicks? ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
