Actually this wasn't in our context till you changed the context. It was not children being protected from pornography or some kind of violience pornography but rather the right to post children IN pornography. You seem to be arguing for that very thing until the rubber hit the road and you changed the terms.
Mike On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Tom Piwowar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I am not a film critic. > > In our context the issue with both "Kill Bill" or "The Passion of the > Christ" (and many other films, I picked these two at random) was > excessive, graphic violence. > > Should children be allowed to see such stuff? > > Sex vs torture? > > Who's values? > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
