>> I am glad that "This Time Microsoft Gets It Right." The issue is how >> much we ought to be charged for a successor to Vista. Should be $0. (Apple >> did that with OS X.1. It was the honest thing to do.) > >That was SP1 for Vista. It's free (which is anti-competitive, right?).
Nope. You don't know how Apple's patches are numbered. Apple's equivalent of SPs are numbered at the third digit. X.1.1, X.1.2, etc. X.1 was like going from NT to 2K. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
