> What do you think the reviewer is telling you by calling Win7 version > 6.5? He does that in the FIRST SENTENCE! He calls it "Vista with the > kinks worked out" in the SECOND PARAGRAPH!
You think that either of those can be fairly rephrased as "Win7 is largely a big bug fix"? Seriously? Here's an idea: Why don't you email the author and ask him if his intent was to characterize Win7 as a "big bug fix"? Ask -him- if he feels that "[Win7] is largely a big bug fix" is an accurate summary of the article. But no matter. If you think that the article is "much more real world" than the recent "hype" and "marketing blather" here (which you failed to document as I requested), that is a good thing because, as I'm sure you noticed, the review was overwhelmingly positive--although no one would get that from your cockeyed summary. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
