So I give you a non MS source...the *actual* head of Android and then I condemn it as...hold on my head is spinning, somebody get me off your crazy ride.
The only puzzling occurrence is your really weird logic. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Tom Piwowar <[email protected]> wrote: > >But then what does the head of Android know? Guys sitting in their > basement > >writing for a blog that plays just to mac zealots obviously know more > about > >Google then just a guy that works there. > > Once again, anything that comes from an independent, non-MS source you > condemn as wicked zealotry. You are so steeped in MS happy talk that you > just can't bear a careful analysis of a puzzeling occurrence. > > The writer observed that it is strange that WINCE got the spotlight, even > though Android phones are expected to arrive before well before WINCE. > That is a good question. When people act oddly it is valid to ask why. > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
