David K Watson wrote:
This is a very common tactic of yours, claiming because Tom hasn't
said something about a behavior that he is condoning it. In the first
place this is an invalid argument. In the second place, why do you
want Tom to be the arbiter of other people's behavior on this list?
The proper person to complain to is the person who did it, so if you
want to properly address your complaint to the right person, why
don't you search through the list archives, find out who did it, and
complain directly to them, with a link to the offending post? That
is the right thing to do, even if it is a little late.
It really is bad form to claim an offense without backing it up.
In other words, I am finding this line of argument tiresome, I don't
think
that it is making any points for you, and I'd be really happy if you
would
move to something more substantive.
Tiresome? I say infantile!
He needs a nap.
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
