On Mon, 25 May 2009 21:20:21 -0400, t.piwowar wrote: >On May 25, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Reid Katan wrote: > >> So what, indeed. My original gripe was with Tom. He whines about >> how useless netbooks are then lavishes glowing praise on the Air >> that fit perfectly with netbooks. He's the one that brought up >> pricing. I just reminded him who it was (the Apple-head thing was >> less about Betty than a dig at Tom :-). > >You can't see any difference between these two computers? I guess you
Okay. Last time. These are your words: "The Air is a niche product, an "ultra portable" laptop. It was stripped of anything unnecessary so that it would be as easy to carry as possible. I think a lot of reviewers did not understand what it was intended for. They kept bringing up "missing" features, but if you valued those missing features over size and weight then you were not the customer that the Air was designed for." Substitute "netbook" for "Air", and, no there isn't much difference. . .except for price. >are auditioning for the next edition of Laptop Hunters. Sure. If Microsoft wants to buy me a computer, who am I to say no? I can sell it and get a Mac. -- R:\katan ------------------------------------------------------------ LET'S GO METS!! LET'S GO METS!! ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
