On May 31, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
There are many ways in which things can be ruined, and they cannot
all be
measured by ratings or subscriber volume.
Aren't we being a bit superficial here?
I asserted that product "A" was declining because product "A" had
declined in quality. That the decline in quality was caused by sharp
staff cut backs and forced retirements of their most talented
producers. I further asserted that maintaining the quality of the
product was the responsibility of management.
Others asserted that product A's decline was due to the ascendency of
product "B" and that A's management was powerless.
I note that product "A" was declining prior to the wide availability
of product "B."
I note that product A's poor management existed prior to the wide
availability of product "B."
Are the defenders of A's poor management suggesting that time travel
was involved in the decline of product "A"?
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
