On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:34 AM, mike wrote:
Did that security hole ever get compromised? That's the argument
from the
mac side, macs have big security holes that are never compromised
so that
equals good security, I hadn't seen that this extension caused one
security
problem. Perhaps it did and it didn't come up in my searches?
You keep trying to change the subject. The issue is that this
vulnerability was inserted into a competitor's product by M$. By
doing so it removed a major advantage of using the competitor's
product. This is particularly important because this is the very same
competing product that was at the center of M$'s anti-trust
conviction. Looks to me like M$ has unilaterally declared the consent
agreement void. Sort of like North Korea declaring the Korean
Armistice Agreement void. (Now I suppose you will spring to the
defense of Kim Jong-il.)
*************************************************************************
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*************************************************************************
