I know there are some who believe Bush is the cause of all problems, past, present, and future, but this isn't one of them. DTV transition started long before his presidency. Check this NYT article from 1997

http://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/10/business/advanced-tv-posing-issue-of-timing.html

First paragraph:

"If the Clinton Administration has its way, every American home will have to replace its television sets with expensive new digital models within eight years -- or risk losing the ability to watch TV at all."

(OK, I'll admit the Bush admin didn't do a great job with the coupon process.)

t.piwowar wrote:
Don't fail to look after the Bush plan for converting to digital fire scheduled for next January. Some have said that doing so in the middle of Winter was a dumb idea, but Bush said "mission accomplished." I don't think it is on BHO's radar yet, with so many other crises to attend to. Try to order your fire converters early.

On Jun 13, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Tony B wrote:
It *was* broke, now it's fixed. For a while, anyway. You wouldn't
really consider driving a 1940 model car today, would you? Your 'fire'
analogy is a really bad one because DTV is a set of standards, not a
universal chemical process.


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************




*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to