Ok, one more try. You do realize the 800 in FW800 actually *means* something right?
Here is a very nice, clean diagram from Wikipedia...but I'm sure you'll say they are just following some party line... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA#SATA_in_comparison_to_other_buses Soon to come perhaps may be FW3200 which is faster then current ESATA speeds, although we have yet to see any mac with this spec. Also if we are going to include soon to be or perhaps not so soon to be released specs, we would have to include USB 3 which toasts both ESATA and FW3200. That said, this conversation was clearly about FW800 and ESATA, the current available techs on the market. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:00 PM, tjpa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 8:59 PM, mike wrote: > >> Well we've learned over time Tom's reality is different from others. >> > > I know Stewart knows how to read and interpret specs, but would rather > follow the party line than correct Mike. > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
