There is also the question of how much force Apple is using to get this done, it's not beyond them to use a hammer when none is needed.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:53 PM, John Duncan Yoyo <johnduncany...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:16 PM, mike <xha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=33652 > > > > > > > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/iphone-raid/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29 > > > > Some say this has been served illegally, partially due to the laws > > regarding > > journalists. Multiple implications of course, are online weblogs run by > > journalists? Does this whole case rise to the level of busting in the > door > > of a private citizen? > > > > Knowingly receiving stolen goods is a crime especially when you pay > $5,000 > for them. The question is if they knew it would be considered stolen > goods. > > -- > John Duncan Yoyo > -------------------------------o) > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
