On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:57 PM, David K Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> As to Apple's involvement, it looks like Apple didn't file the theft > report. Powell did, with the support of his employer's legal staff. > True, Apple clearly wanted the matter to be pursued, but Powell > is arguably the more aggrieved party. The more aggrieved party? Can you explain that, please. Mr. Powell apparently faces no recriminations from his employer over this matter. How is he so aggrieved? I would suspect that Apple Corp. simply wanted to keep their name out of the matter to all extents possible, as is typically the case with any corporation. Steve ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
