Barton schrieb: > Let me first say that I am having great fun and success with comtypes!
Cool! > A recent project required a connection to an MS Jet database, so I > downloaded adodbapi. Those guy have their reasons (I suppose) for > choosing pywin32 - and providing IronPython (yuck) support. > > Here's what I've been up to: > Just for fun I replaced adodbapi's pythoncom dispatch with > CreateObject("ADODB.Connection") - custom. > Things went along just fine until I tried to fetch many columns from > the db: > The custom interface returned the expected length list fo rows, but > the rows (tuples) were of lenght = 1 containing the corect data for > the first column. > > After some time poking around in comtypes and reading the mail list, I > tried CreateObject("ADODB.Connection", dynamic=True) . > Success!! All rows are fetched properly! > I then decided to re-organize and rename the module - maybe someday > breath new life into one of the earlier, sleeping projects - > adodbapi turns out to be very cumbersome to type and I trying to find > a way to work "comtypes" into the name - but I digress... Let me try to make sure I understand you correctly (being no native english speaker): you don't like to type the word 'adodapi' ;-) ? > > Once I could see the mechanics of the module, I began to look at the > inner workings: > It seems that comtyps is doing all the type conversion of individual > fields of the query result (something that the original module worked > very hard at) before the data (list of tuples) arrives. > > So, I'm trying to understand if a "custom" interface should have > behaved differently, if this "dynamic" behavior can be explained in a > few word, if there are any pitfalls that I may be headed for, and if > pythoncom lacks this kind type conversion. Well. comtypes is very young, compared to pywin32, and 'dynamic=True' is even much younger. We have still to understand all the differences between the three ways that comtypes provides: custom interface, dynamic dispatch (using the comtypes.client.dynamic module), and 'dynamic=True' (which is using the new comtypes.client.lazybind module). Ideally they should all behave the same... I cannot answer your third question 'if pythoncom lacks this kind of type conversion' since I don't use it any more. If you can provide a script that exercises some adodb commands, I will try to convert that into a comtypes unittest and may be able to look into differences of the three ways. > I appreciate any thoughts on this. > Thank you, > Barton > -- Thanks, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ comtypes-users mailing list comtypes-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/comtypes-users