On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:37:32 -0700 Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill LaGrue wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:33:35 -0800 > > Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Bill LaGrue wrote: > >>> Hi Phil, > >>> Dump done and duly emailed. > >> I had some time to look at this. I've enumerated the differences > >> and have a few theories - but can one or both of you send me the > >> Connectivity.EZHex file that the website gives you? I need that to > >> correlate these differences. Thanks. > >> > > > > Done. I also filed a bug report as requested. > > OK, can you try the attached patch? > > There are two main differences between what we do and what they do: > > 1. In the cookies they pass everything the XML tells them to, plus a > serial number encoded as the "CookieKeyValue" cookie. We weren't > doing that last part. This patch fixes that. > > 2. In the POST, there's tons of random state variables we've never > bothered to send that they seem to ignore anyway. This patch doesn't > touch this part. > > So the cookies we send should now be inline with what they send. It > seems to work for me, but it worked for me before, so that doesn't > say much other than that this shouldn't be _worse_. > > Give it a shot, if it works for you, I'll commit it. > Hi Phil Forgive my ignorance...but how do you apply the patch? I'm getting 'Hunk failed' errors, so I'm obviously not doing it right.. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
