On Fri, March 14, 2008 2:23 am, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > That said, it appears that variables declared not at the top was in fact > not > part of the c89 spec. But there was definitely pre-ANSI C. > > I'm annoyed that gcc doesn't get angry about that stuff. It really should. > Ah well, I'll fix it up next time I have a few minutes, won't take long.
I seem to recall gcc supported "inline" variable declarations as a gcc extension to non-c99 C. Using -ansi might not be enough to get it not to. Isn't there a -strict or -strict-ansi or -c89/90 flag that does that? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
