Kevin Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Stephen Warren opined: >> I guess alternatively -Werror might do the trick, together with the -W you >> mentioned. That also has some potential for other negative fallout though. > > Probably a silly question, but why the move from *.cpp to *.c? Why not leave > concordance as a class-less C++ program?
Because we're providing a C API for people to use, so it makes sense to make sure our client is a C program to ensure our API really does always work with C programs. -- Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
