On 11/05/2013 05:44 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: >> It's actually quite elegant actually. >> >> There will be 3 init systems for a long time at this point, so I think your >> solution is awesome. > > Glad you like it. I was a little bit concerned about adding a dependency > on 'at' but I assume that is a pretty standard thing that most people are > going to have installed anyway.
Funny, Debian Technical Committee will be deciding on the next init system shortly. Arguements for the committee: https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/ Relevent LWN story (subscribers only): http://lwn.net/Articles/572805/ I rather hope they go with systemd... I'm not an upstart fan. -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel