|
First, much thanks to Sandy for the
free publicity.
Second, may I also recommend both to
Sandy and to others, the Congressional debate on the removal power (some of
which is excerpted in Graber and Perhac, MARBURY V. MADISON--a too expensive
collection on the background of Marbury). What is most interest is a) most
framers clearly indicate they believe in judicial review and b) substantial
dispute over whether judicial review means judicial supremacy (majority seems to
be judicial supremacy).
MAG
|
- Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Robert Justin Lipkin
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Sanford Levinson
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Mark Graber
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Eric Segall
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbu... Sanford Levinson
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Eric Segall
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbu... Sanford Levinson
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Tom Grey
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Eric Segall
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Robert Sheridan
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbu... Sanford Levinson
- Re: Teaching Contemporary Cases Before Marbury Robert Justin Lipkin
