Wouldn't Raines v. Byrd suggest that the legislators are not the best plaintiffs?
Given Rooker-Feldman (something I usually try not to talk about), and given Bush v. Gore (because why not bring that up whenever possible?), shouldn't they seek Supreme Court review of the state court case? Ann "Edward A Hartnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >.... Perhaps > those who were not parties to the state proceeding are not bound by it, but > aren't the best plaintiffs in the federal case the legislators, and weren't > they defendants in the state proceeding? ...
