I confess to thinking the permanent structures v. temporary speech distinction better.  I think a very reasonable claim can be made that
 
a) a permanent structure is likely to be misperceived as a state message, regardless of surroundings.
 
b) public fora are subject to time, place and manner restrictions.  One legitimate restriction is that one cannot permanently occupy scarce space.
 
Mark A. Graber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/13/03 02:26PM >>>
Would it be possible to draft a "hate speech" law that covers this situation
and could be upheld?

Judy Baer

Reply via email to