So, my official vote is -1. The name shouldn't have been a candidate from the start.
Karl On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like there is a service mark "HMS Connex". That's probably > not a problem. BUT: > > "ConneX is a pure p2p collaboration platform based on JXTA > technologie". Open source, and available for download from > SourceForge. For me, that pretty much nixes use of the name. > > Let me recalculate the totals with Jack's actual preferences and come > up with the second choice, which I hope was vetted more carefully than > this one. > > Karl > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> The names were supposed to have been vetted by those submitting them? >> That was part of the submission rules. >> >> Ok, let me go do some research on Connex myself... >> Karl >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Jack Krupansky >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 to rename >>> >>> So, (assuming the vote succeeds for rename) the official Apache name would >>> be "Apache Connex", the full name in documentation and promotion would be >>> "[the] Apache Connex Connectors Framework", in common use we would say >>> "Connex" (including email and doc after the initial full reference), the >>> package name would be "connex", the class name prefix would be "Connex", and >>> the subdomain name would be http://connex.apache.org. >>> >>> -- Jack Krupansky >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Karl Wright" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:58 PM >>> To: "connectors-dev" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to Connex >>> >>>> Vote +1 if you want to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Connex, >>>> -1 if you want to keep Connectors Framework as the Apache name. >>>> >>>> This voting opportunity will expire at the end of the working day on >>>> Friday, EDT. >>>> >>>> Karl >>> >>> >> >
