+1 on just moving down the list. We put our votes in order, so this makes perfect sense to me. Why revote? Next candidate in the list!
- Mark On 9/28/10 6:52 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Jack, > > That's one of the main purposes of having everyone list choices by > priority. If one doesn't work, there are others you can use. > > I don't want to open that vote again unless the community decides that > the list of candidate names was simply not rich enough to furnish a > good choice. > > Karl > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Jack Krupansky > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or Nocon or Noman. >> >> I know people are tired of voting, but I think we should really re-vote for >> the revised candidate list with Connex removed. >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Mark Miller" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:43 PM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF >> >>> hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing? >>> >>> On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >>>> >>>> Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF. >>>> Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain >>>> Connex, if that wins its vote. >>>> >>>> This vote also expires end of day on Friday. >>>> >>>> Note: "Manifold" is a trademark for a GIS software product. However, >>>> I agree with Grant that ManifoldCF appearing under the Apache label >>>> should be safe to be used. But you should recognize that this vote is >>>> not merely a referendum on the name itself, but also on the >>>> suitability of the name in a legal context. >>>> >>>> Karl >>> >>
