2011/12/29 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: > I found a potential blocker for 0.4-incubator, CONNECTORS-342. I > think it is severe enough to require respin of the candidate. The bad > HTML causes the "Save" button to vanish and makes the File Connector > only barely usable. > > I've also found UI problems with the CMIS and Alfresco connectors; the > way hiddens are managed is incorrect so that you can get ${xxx} values > stuffed in the fields on the initial post/repost. In addition they > both suffer from lack of proper escaping of values in the UI. The > OpenSearchServer connector also suffers from the latter. These bugs > are pretty severe in my opinion and I've captured them in > CONNECTORS-343. > > I've checked in a fix to the branch for CONNECTORS-342. The fix for > CONNECTORS-343 is a bit more extensive but is certainly doable within > the 0.4-incubating release. Piergiorgio, do you agree that we should > try to fix this for this release?
I agree that we have to fix these issues as soon as possible. I have to reproduce the issue on the CMIS and Alfresco connector, I hope to work on this this afternoon. Piergiorgio > > Karl > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> As long as your changes are committed to trunk, I can push them to the >> site immediately. They just won't be in the documentation that ships >> with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, is all. >> >> So it sounds like we have a vote to release, as soon as we wait the >> full 72 hours. ;-) >> Karl >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2011/12/20 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: >>>> Piergiorgio wants to include a section in the "how to build and >>>> deploy" documentation for the Alfresco connector. To me this is not >>>> really an important enough change to spin another RC, but since we're >>>> still waiting for Tommaso to review our releases there may be time to >>>> do it. >>>> >>>> But, right now, I vote +1 for RC0. We'll see if Piergiorgio withdraws his >>>> vote. >>> >>> It's not a problem for me to release this RC0, but I would like to >>> update at least the website documentation about how to build the >>> Alfresco Connector. I hope this night to work on this new section and >>> then we can push an update of the website. >>> >>> Piergiorgio >>> >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Thank you. I understand. >>>>> >>>>> +1 for me. >>>>> >>>>> Shinichiro Abe >>>>> >>>>> On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external >>>>>> hsqldb database. It does not require the >>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try >>>>>> out the multiprocess example, take the following steps: >>>>>> >>>>>> (1) In one shell prompt, start the database: "start-database.bat/.sh" >>>>>> (2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: >>>>>> "initialize.bat/.sh" >>>>>> (3) When that is done, start the agents proces: "start-agents.bat/.sh" >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Karl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database >>>>>>> requires >>>>>>> 'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a >>>>>>> relative path: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <property name="org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath" value="."/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property. >>>>>>> Should I send a patch? Next? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Shinichiro Abe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree >>>>>>>> this should be released please vote +1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of >>>>>>>> the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change >>>>>>>> those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please >>>>>>>> note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per >>>>>>>> Jukka's suggestion.] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, >>>>>>>> though, and passes all tests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> Karl >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Piergiorgio Lucidi >>> http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
