Hi, Marcel, Thanks for your hint. Indeed two patches created, but one is 0001-service-don-t-keep-ref-to-a-removed-network.patch, inside it writes: >From a7d29e4866c9d7a4eed2f550c1ac7c8c89b56245 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pekka Pessi <[email protected]> ....
But that patch should already accepted long ago, curious why it was generated on my side... so I just commit the 2nd patch. Yes, it should be called EDNS0 according to RFC2671. Best regards, YingAn -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcel Holtmann Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove EDNS option when export resolve file Hi Ying, > From: Deng Ying An <[email protected]> > > --- > src/resolver.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) please never ever hijack a thread. This way patches will get lost and ignored by us. And why is this 2/2 anyway? Also for this kind of patch, it needs a proper commit message explaining why you are doing this. Quick side note, the option is really called EDNS0. Check the RFC for details. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
