Hi,

I'm currently doing some tests after moving from connman-0.64 to last release. Maybe I"m wrong but it seems that now ip v4 address is not correctly released when changing configuration from dhcp to manual. That leads to have multiple IP on interface (is it quite similar to http://lists.connman.net/pipermail/connman/2011-April/004699.html ?)

my test:
ip addr show dev eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:1a:92:db:f2:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.11/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0

./set-ipv4-method ethernet_001a92dbf27a_cable manual 10.23.23.23 255.255.255.0

ip addr show dev eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:1a:92:db:f2:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.11/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0
    inet 10.23.23.23/24 brd 10.23.23.255 scope global eth0

./set-ipv4-method ethernet_001a92dbf27a_cable dhcp

ip addr show dev eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:1a:92:db:f2:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.11/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0


I found something which seems to correct this, but I'm not sure it's the correct way to do it

---
 src/network.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/network.c b/src/network.c
index 123857e..1082e2d 100644
--- a/src/network.c
+++ b/src/network.c
@@ -1137,6 +1137,7 @@ int __connman_network_clear_ipconfig(struct connman_network *network,
                __connman_ipconfig_address_remove(ipconfig);
                break;
        case CONNMAN_IPCONFIG_METHOD_DHCP:
+               __connman_ipconfig_address_remove(ipconfig);
                __connman_dhcp_stop(network);
                break;
        }
--
1.7.1

regards
Thierry
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to