Hi Marcel,

Thanks for the reply.
So, I going to start doing it.

Regards,
Flávio Ceolin

On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 07:03 -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
> 
> > I've working in a project using using using wifi-direct (p2p), and I
> > planning implementing it on connman, I saw that there is an item in the
> > TODO about it.
> > 
> > So, my plan is create a new technology wifi_p2p, the implementation and
> > behaviour should be pretty similar to wifi technology. It will be
> > necessary add support for p2p in the existent gsupplicant code.
> > As the p2p, the idea is cover just a small set of functions for now, for
> > connect we'll use just the push button control (PBC) method. The
> > connection will be done without use the Group concept, I mean, both
> > peers will use the command connect and one of them will be chosen the
> > Group Owner, instead of one Peer create a Group and the other Peer join
> > into this Group. The reason for this is that according with the wpa
> > developers to use Group Add + Join is not the recommended way.
> 
> so I am not sure that a new technology wifi_p2p is a good idea, but I
> could be wrong here. It is just a feeling that this might not be the
> best approach. However this should not stop you from trying. So go ahead
> here and we see where it leads us. Just make sure that you send RFC
> patches early. So you get more eyes on it.
> 
> And for GSupplicant support for P2P, that sounds like a good idea
> anyway. So I would start with that. Maybe at that point it also becomes
> a lot clearer on how P2P fits into legacy WiFi networks in a clean way
> without breaking everything else.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Marcel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> connman mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman


_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to