Hi Arron, >> behaviour should be pretty similar to wifi technology. It will be >> necessary add support for p2p in the existent gsupplicant code. >> As the p2p, the idea is cover just a small set of functions for now, for >> connect we'll use just the push button control (PBC) method. The > I think we also need support pin method, most netbook and handset does not > have the push button:(, if we don't support pin method, this p2p feature may > be useless for them. > Actually, this could be fixed. wpa_supplicant WPS interface is made so you select which wps "role" you want to play. Currently, I only used "enrollee" since it was meant to support wps into connman only as a client. But g_supplicant could be easily patched to be able to use the same wps dbus interface to request a "registrar" role. Though, this brings some questions: is wpa_supplicant providing the whole security handshake as a registrar then, or does it require some external security stuff etc...
Anyway, that's something people implementing p2p into connman should find out. I don't see the interest of providing wps as a registrar in those devices, but for p2p support maybe. Tomasz _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
