Hi Daniel, >> My proposal is about the contrary: there will be dozens of application >> using session api, so why not limiting the information flow from dbus to >> the strictly necessary only. > Of course we should not send a new message just to clear the settings, > this can be as is it now send in the same message. My point was not about multiple message but about message's content. But ok I am fine with how it's done now, though I still think ui could be a bit smarter. So let's forget patch 2. patch 6 is valid but need a small modif (it will notify empty Ipv*) > I think this is breaking the behaviour pattern of the ConnMan API we > have so far. Ok. I had in mind that, despite Manager/Service API, Session API will be in use by dozens of apps so this will generate way more messages with quite some content. > If it helps, I have a test UI for the sessions. With this UI you find > easily bugs :) Definitely! I am currently using test-session and some client of my own which supports only a few parts of session API. So your UI would really help here.
Cheers, Tomasz _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
