On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:20 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> My argument here is that if we start to optimize on this level
> (message size) we need some real numbers first. For example, how much
> do 50 extra bytes hurt?
The message size is not that relevant for a few numbers of apps. When
the amount of apps starts to increase, we're in for more pressure
removing this redundant info. But meanwhile, app and UI writers have
learned to ignore the meaning of State, since they think ConnMan will
babysit for them and tell the state for each and every property. And
then we have a problem.
That said, I'd vote for State being the important information to follow
and all the rest sent only when needed. Thus I'd go for the option to
leave out the other redundant information when State is 'disconnected'.
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
