On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 12:13 +0300, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Patrik Flykt <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's a patch implementing ServicesChanged signal while removing
> ServicesAdded
> and ServicesRemoved signals.
>
> If we allow service properties to alwas be empty when the service is changed,
> the new signal can be considered implemented. If we want to send the updated
> properties as well, there will be a need to add quite some amount of update
> flags into the service structure. Also, ServicesChanged signal will be
> sent whenever the service sequence is sorted. Unfortunately the sequence
> sorting function does not tell whether the ordering got changed. With the
> current implementation ConnMan wil thus send ServicesChanged also if the
> order really did not change. Fixing this would again add some extra code,
> I don't know how "perfect" behavior we want for this case.
>
> For new services, all properties will be sent like previously with the
> ServicesAdded signal.
Both patches pushed.
ServicesAdded and ServicesRemoved have now been replaced with
ServicesChanged. The documentation has also been updated.
Happy ConnManning!
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
