Even having the configuration of Session overwriting the ConnMan, which is the order that has to be considered by the ConnMan for the AllowedBarer? I do not see any PRIO in the policy file, I’m right? If the two routes are present and a session connect is required (online the one with less PRIO from AllowedBarer point of view), what’s happen?
> On 09 Sep 2015, at 16:37, Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 09/09/2015 04:33 PM, Patrik Flykt wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 16:15 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: >>> - Only autoconnect if there is a session asking for connection >>> - refcounting, how many times Sessions asked for a connection. >>> When no Session wants a connection anymore -> disconnect. >> >> That's true. But was the order between services online first followed by >> preferred technologies or allowed bearers only or undefined. Maybe I'll >> try to read the code to figure out what is actually happening... > > IIRC we couldn't agree on the ordering etc. I wanted to have the > configuration of Session overwriting ConnMan's default behavior :) _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
