On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 16:50 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > For Session routing tables that is also an ok approach, if someone
> is
> > able to implement it... :-)
>
> Not sure if I read this right, but this works now. What do you mean
> with Session routing tables?
The global routing is handled properly. Without looking thoroughly into
the code I'm not sure whether the routing table for a specific session
follows the same ordering of the bearers or not. Or if it's supposed to
order routes differently.
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
