Send connman mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of connman digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [PATCH 0/2] Resend of patches... (Daniel Wagner)
   2. Re: [PATCH 0/4] d-bus reply to "scan p2p" is not send if
      wifi/p2p scanning interleave in some unlucky way (Vasyl Vavrychuk)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:00:44 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
To: Jonas Bonn <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Resend of patches...
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi Jonas,

On 01/04/2018 11:23 AM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> ...I think these might have gotten missed with the long quiescent period
> over the holidays.  These were originally sent on December 9 but received
> no feedback.

Oh darn, sorry about it. I had quite a workload during December.

Both patches look good to me. Applied both of them.

Thanks,
Daniel


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:06:31 +0200
From: Vasyl Vavrychuk <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
        [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] d-bus reply to "scan p2p" is not send if
        wifi/p2p scanning interleave in some unlucky way
Message-ID:
        <cagj4m+75zpxlfjs6ko67_wccgbcuo-3usrn32rusto5byye...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi, Daniel,

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Daniel Wagner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Vasyl,
>
> On 12/26/2017 11:45 PM, Vasyl Vavrychuk wrote:
>
> I suppose everyone had enough time to review it :) I was pondering if we
> need the to extend connman_device_get_scanning() to except the SERVICE type
> or just a bool saying it is a wifi or p2p service because the function is
> only used for wifi or p2p. But then I think I would just do shedding :)

That's an interesting idea. I am not sure if it matters.

> So I went ahead and applied it after changing a few nitpicks (just
> formatting) and adding the log snippets directly into the commit message in
> patch #2. The commit message should be self contained. We have no influence
> on the external resources and the links might just go stale after a while.

Thanks for your work. I will try to write better messages in future.
>
> My normal wifi stuff still works, so any p2p complains will be forwarded to
> you :D

I will be happy to look on that.

Kind regards,
Vasyl


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/connman


------------------------------

End of connman Digest, Vol 27, Issue 2
**************************************

Reply via email to