Email digest for the Global Conservation Forum (ConsDistList) egroup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 1. Open position -- Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor of Objects 
Conservation

 2. Culpeper Fellowship

 3. conservation literature: publication donations available

 4. RE: XRF on ethnographic collection

 5. Laser Discussion Group

 6. Recommendations for Re-gilding Techniques for Porcelain?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.From: Matthew Hayes
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  9:40 AM
 Subject: Open position -- Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor of Objects 
Conservation
 Message: 
Dear Colleagues,


A reminder that the Conservation Center is still accepting applications for its 
open Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor of Objects Conservation position.


The application deadline is December 15.


You can find details and apply at:


https://apply.interfolio.com/175143 <https://apply.interfolio.com/175143> 


Please note that while the successful candidate will hold a terminal 
conservation degree, they need not have a doctorate. 


Feel free to be in touch with any questions about the application process or 
the position.


Very best wishes,


Matt Hayes





------------------------------
Matthew Hayes, PhD
Assistant Professor of Paintings Conservation
Conservation Center, Institute of Fine Arts, New York University
14 East 78th Street, New York, NY 10075
[email protected]
------------------------------


2.From: Jay Krueger
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  1:18 PM
 Subject: Culpeper Fellowship
 Message:  NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, CONSERVATION DIVISION
  Charles E. Culpeper Advanced Training Fellowship in Painting Conservation
  With an endowment from the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation, the National 
Gallery of Art is offering a fellowship in the painting conservation 
department.  The three-year fellowship will commence in September of 2026 and 
include a yearly stipend of $53,000 plus health benefits and $3,000 each year 
for travel and research. Fellows will receive transit benefits towards their 
commuting costs to and from the National  Gallery.
  Working under the guidance of the National Gallery's conservators and 
scientists, the fellow will focus on two aspects:  treatment of the collection  
and a self-selected research project that culminates in a publishable paper. 
The fellow will have the opportunity to collaborate with conservators, 
scientists and curators. They will also have access to the National Gallery's 
collections and to advanced analytical  instrumentation available in the 
scientific research department. Lectures, symposia, and informal discussions at 
the National Gallery of Art contribute to the fellowship program.    
  Eligibility
  Candidates should be graduates from a recognized master's program in 
conservation or have equivalent training. They should have no more than five 
years  of work experience after graduation and a proven record of research and 
writing ability. Candidates must possess English language skills. 
  Application Procedure
  Interested candidates must submit the following materials in English:
   Transcripts of both undergraduate and graduate courses of academic study 
(unofficial copies are acceptable)
   A curriculum vitae including basic biographical information and current and 
permanent addresses, telephone number, and a description of previous  
conservation experience and internships
   A statement of interest and intent (no more than two single-spaced pages) of 
the candidate's in applying for the fellowship
   Offprints/Reprints in PDF format of publications and lectures
   Two letters of recommendation from conservation professionals familiar with 
the candidate's work and one letter of personal reference (emailed directly  to 
the address below) 
  File naming convention for submissions: Last Name_First Name_Document type 
(e.g., Transcripts) _Date (Year-Month-Day)
  Formal  applications and supporting materials must be submitted in PDF format 
by email to [email protected] <[email protected]> and  arrive at the Gallery no later 
than January 17, 2026. Applicants will be notified of the decision by the end 
of February 2026. The fellowship may begin on or after September 21, 2026 and 
will end September 29, 2029. 
  For inquiries, please contact:
  Tyrese Davis, Conservation Administrator
  [email protected]
               The National Gallery of Art serves the nation by welcoming all 
people to explore and experience art, creativity, and our shared humanity.
    
 


3.From: Andrea Chevalier
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  6:23 PM
 Subject: conservation literature: publication donations available
 Message: 
As I approach retirement, I would like to donate some of the conservation 
literature in my library.


Available are:


Journal of the American Institure for Conservation, 1991-2021


Studies in Conservation, 1989-2021


National Gallery of Art, London, Technical Bulletins, Vols. 10-13, 15-17 and 
19-24


Zeitschrift fuer Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, 1987-1994


These will be donations but shipping costs will have to be shared or covered in 
some manner.





Andrea Chevalier


Head of Paintings Conservation


ICA-Art Conservation


Cleveland OH


USA


[email protected]




------------------------------
Andrea Chevalier
Head of Paintings Conservation, Director of Conservation
ICA-Art Conservation
Cleveland
United States
------------------------------


4.From: Thiago Sevilhano Puglieri
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  6:23 PM
 Subject: RE: XRF on ethnographic collection
 Message: Dear Stefanie,

Thank you for raising this important conversation. My name is Thiago Puglieri 
and I am a heritage scientist (originally from chemistry) working with 
technical art history and conservation science at the University of California 
Los Angeles, UCLA.

Considering your message and the replies, I would like to mention that Ellen 
Pearlstein and I have a forthcoming book chapter addressing ethical 
considerations and community engagement in the scientific investigation of 
Indigenous sacred and ceremonial items. It will be published in the book Art 
Objects and the Scientific Method: Global Perspectives and Practices, edited by 
Maria Kokkori and Francesca Casadio (Routledge). 

Aligned with your perspective, Indigenous sacred and ceremonial items are often 
perceived as living entities rather than mere objects. Additionally, they are 
typically made of materials imbued with spiritual significance and associated 
with traditional knowledge that should remain confidential. Given their status 
as living entities with spiritual connections and their often-sensitive and 
secret material nature, researchers and scientists should approach these items 
with specific care and respect. In such a context, even techniques 
traditionally considered materially non-invasive and non-destructive in science 
– such as XRF - could be considered invasive and destructive for the 
significance and intangible dimensions of the items.

In our chapter, we discuss these points in depth, addressing ethical 
considerations for 1) sampling and destructive analyses, 2) non-invasive and 
non-destructive analyses, 3) publication and dissemination of scientific 
results, and 4) uses and impacts of the research outcomes.

I would like to suggest you contact our colleagues from the Fowler Museum, 
UCLA. They have done wonderful work with communities and sacred and ceremonial 
items, and have relevant experience that could be helpful for your situation. I 
would be happy to put you contact with them, and also discuss this topic 
further if you (or anyone else) wish. Please do not hesitate in contacting me: 
[email protected] <[email protected]>

With best wishes,

Thiago

 Thiago Sevilhano Puglieri, Assistant Professor

UCLA - University of California, Los Angeles

Department of Art History <https://arthistory.ucla.edu/>

UCLA/Getty Program in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage 
<https://conservation.ucla.edu/>

 

UCLA Latin American Institute <https://www.international.ucla.edu/lai/>

UCLA Center for Brazilian Studies 
<https://www.international.ucla.edu/lai/center/brazil>

UCLA Center for 17th- & 18th-Century Studies <https://www.1718.ucla.edu/>


------------------------------
Thiago Sevilhano Puglieri
Assistant Professor
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles
United States
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 11-10-2025 06:38
From: Stefanie Scheerer
Subject: XRF on ethnographic collection

I am facing the following situation:
An ethnographic museum in Germany is planning to perform pesticide measurements 
on their entire collection, formerly collected across all continents. Included 
are also some sacred objects / objects for ritual purpose and potentially 
ancestors. However, so far there is no contact with the communities of origin. 
Nevertheless, the museum intends to measure every object with XRF. ( I am aware 
of the limits of XRF on organic pesticides)
I brought to the museum's attention that source communities should be generally 
contacted and asked for permission before performing XRF analyses. In the case 
of this forthcoming project there is only little time left for further actions. 
Instead, occupational health and safety issues require testing to be performed 
within the next few months. Indirect wipe sampling is most likely not an 
option, since XRF may not sensitive enough to give reliable results. However, 
any ideas on indirect XRF testing of wipes/swabs are also appreciated. Other 
indirect analytical methods such as GC/MS are too expensive to be performed on 
the entire collection.
Currently, I'm wondering how other museums address this problem.
Are you aware of any museum that has a protocol when collection-wide XRF 
analyses is planned? It would be very helpful to see any written document 
addressing this issue.
Are you aware of other museums performing or not performing XRF analyses on 
sacred objects / ancestors / objects for ritual purposes when contact to source 
communities does not exist?
Should ancestral items be treated like human remains or possibly like human 
beings. This would, however, mean that XRF analysis must not be performed, 
since pointing an X-ray beam at a human being is inacceptable.
Do you maybe know whom I could contact for such information? 
 
Thank you very much for your support and taking your time on this!
Sincerely,

Stefanie



Dr. Stefanie Scheerer

Microbiology & Conservation

Stuttgart, Germany

[email protected] <[email protected]>


------------------------------
Stefanie Scheerer
Microbiologist & Conservator
Freelance/Private Practice/Self-employed/Independent
Stuttgart
Germany
------------------------------


5.From: Adam Jenkins
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  6:24 PM
 Subject: Laser Discussion Group
 Message: Colleagues,The Laser Discussion Group has been live for a few weeks 
now and those of you who previously asked us to add you to the list have been 
added.  Please check the site and make sure we have the right email address and 
your email preferences are set as you would like them to be.
If you are not a member and would like to be, please follow the instructions 
below.
If you have questions, please email me or one of the other moderators.Very 
best,Adam
                    Hi there, 
   
  Were excited to invite you to the AIC Lasers Discussion Group (LDG)! The LDG 
is an online community dedicated to advancing the use of laser technologies in 
art and heritage conservation, as well as welcoming communication and 
collaboration among art conservation and cultural heritage professionals. 
  If you (or whoever you share this with) are not an AIC member, dont worry-- 
being an AIC member isnt required to join the group. Follow these instructions 
to get started: 
   
  1.      Create an account 
         Visit 
https://www.culturalheritage.org/conservation-at-work/build-community/allcommunities
 
<https://www.culturalheritage.org/conservation-at-work/build-community/allcommunities>
 
         Select the "Log In" button in the upper right corner of the page.  
         Select the "Create Login" tab in the pop-up. 
         Sign up using Apple, Google, or LinkedIn, OR create your own account 
by entering in your email address and creating a password for AIC. Take note of 
the password you create; you will need it to log in to post to the community. 
         The AIC website will walk you through steps to create your account.  
                                                                i.      When 
prompted to "Tell us a little more about yourself and why you are coming to our 
site today", select "I am joining an online community" from the drop-down menu. 
         Fill out your profile information. Note: Fields marked with an * are 
required. The rest are optional. Skip any questions that do not apply). 
         Click "Create Account" at the bottom of the page. Make sure to agree 
to the Terms & Conditions to complete the account.  
   
  2.      Join the Laser Discussion Group 
         After completing your account registration, select the "Communities" 
tab on the top drop-down bar. If you can't find the communities tab, click 
here: 
https://www.culturalheritage.org/conservation-at-work/build-community/allcommunities
 
<https://www.culturalheritage.org/conservation-at-work/build-community/allcommunities>
 
         Select "All Communities" from the drop-down list-this will take you to 
the list of all AIC communities. 
         Scroll down to the Laser Discussion Group and click the "Request to 
Join" button.  
   
  3.      Set your email delivery preferences 
         After requesting to join, a pop-up window will ask two questions: a 
short statement on why you'd like to join the laser group and email delivery 
preferences. You may choose from: 
  -          Real time: sends an email every time a new message is posted. 
  -          Daily digest: sends one email to you each day, consolidating all 
of the posts from the previous day. 
  -          No email: allows you to be part o the group without having emails 
sent to you. You can still post and read others' messages by logging into the 
community site. 
  We recommend the Daily Digest, as it allows you to follow the discussions 
without bombarding you with emails. 
   
  Let us know if you are having any difficulties or have any questions. 
   
  Adam Jenkins 
  Laser Discussion Group 
       

-- 
Adam JenkinsConservator of Sculpture and Decorative Arts Mobile: 215-380-6426

6.From: Halina Piasecki
 Posted: Thursday November 13, 2025  6:24 PM
 Subject: Recommendations for Re-gilding Techniques for Porcelain?
 Message: 
Hi there,


I am currently working on a partially gilded Meissen tea caddy at the Cooper 
Hewitt with discrete areas of loss and abrasion to the gilded borders. I'm 
wondering if anyone has had any success with techniques for re-gilding as loss 
compensation on porcelain that they would be willing to share. I have made some 
porcelain mockups for testing specifically for this project, and I plan to 
share the results of these tests after the project is complete. If you have any 
suggestions these will be credited to you in the write-up. Thanks so much in 
advance for your help with this!





Halina Piasecki


Graduate Fellow, Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Museum


------------------------------
Halina Piasecki
Graduate Fellow (Class of 2026)
Conservation Center of the Institute of Fine Arts, NYU
New York
United States
------------------------------




You are subscribed to "Global Conservation Forum (ConsDistList)" as 
[email protected]. To change your subscriptions, go to 
http://community.culturalheritage.org/preferences?section=Subscriptions.  To 
unsubscribe from this community discussion, go to 
https://community.culturalheritage.org/HigherLogic/eGroups/Unsubscribe.aspx?UserKey=d16eaa87-0f69-494b-9f2f-303dbc1222e1&sKey=fab9aa4f27a04c5d876e&GroupKey=757a8f16-505f-4323-8e74-e376757aa9f7.

Reply via email to