Great! And one can always move on to STRICT-TAGS later, for grammars
with a stable set of definitions.
-- Eckhard
On 05/22/2017 02:47 PM, Tino Didriksen wrote:
In r12202 I've added a LIST-TAGS feature, that Eckhard wanted instead
of STRICT-TAGS at NoDaLiDa. Same syntax as STRICT-TAGS, but only does
the LIST shorthand part. E.g.:
LIST-TAGS += X Y Z ;
would be the same as
LIST X = X ;
LIST Y = Y ;
LIST Z = Z ;
-- Tino Didriksen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Constraint Grammar" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Eckhard Bick,
cand.med., dr.phil.
University of Southern Denmark
e-mail: [email protected]
web: http://beta.visl.sdu.dk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Constraint Grammar" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
