Replied inline... On 9 June 2017 at 12:44, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know it's not trivial to make heuristics for tag placement here, but > it seems like it could be possible to have a heuristic similar to the > SUBSTITUTE heuristic one, like > > place <extra tags> after the last removed tag from <extra tags>, > otherwise at the end of the reading > > so that you could write > > COPY (A Superl &SUGGEST) EXCEPT (A) TARGET (A &syn-super-part2) IF (NOT > 0 (&SUGGEST)); > > (On the other hand, if people depend on the current behaviour, perhaps new > rule options BEFORE/AFTER <tag> might be a better solution …) Using the except tag could work, but like Substitute it'd really be more of a hack. I am vastly more in favour of Before/After as insertion point - this could also be extended to Substitute. Given we have the keywords we might as well make use of them. -- Tino Didriksen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
