Tino Didriksen <[email protected]> čálii: > Replied inline... > > On 9 June 2017 at 12:44, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I know it's not trivial to make heuristics for tag placement here, but > > it seems like it could be possible to have a heuristic similar to the > > SUBSTITUTE heuristic one, like > > > > place <extra tags> after the last removed tag from <extra tags>, > > otherwise at the end of the reading > > > > so that you could write > > > > COPY (A Superl &SUGGEST) EXCEPT (A) TARGET (A &syn-super-part2) IF (NOT 0 > > (&SUGGEST)); > > > > (On the other hand, if people depend on the current behaviour, perhaps new > > rule options BEFORE/AFTER <tag> might be a better solution …) > > > > Using the except tag could work, but like Substitute it'd really be more of > > a hack. > > I am vastly more in favour of Before/After as insertion point - this could > also be extended to Substitute. Given we have the keywords we might as well > make > use of them.
I'd be very happy with that solution :) Keywords are more explicit and easier to reason about. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Constraint Grammar" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/constraint-grammar. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
