As part of current Red Hat Hub investigation / spike efforts I've added a card that each registered user of our registry should have its own namespace, maybe below an other namespace. By default only visible to the user himself but also allowing sharing the images inside with others / all. Not discussed with any of the owners yet, just added the card to avoid that it gets lost.
If not possible maybe as a dedicated registry (OpenShift Online similar to the ISV registry?) under our federated index including links and pointers from related product related WebUI (Red Hat Hub) meta information pages (sthg like "...if you're using this beautiful XYZ image you might want to check out this beautiful demo using this product created by user XYZ..."). The idea behind was Scott's request to make demo images available to a broader community but hosted under the Red Hat umbrella and not somewhere outside (DockerHub or similar). Dirk On 03/03/2016 08:35 PM, Scott McCarty wrote: > So, I don't have a massive horse in this race, but I will say it keeps coming > up all over Red Hat. Because of this, I created an article defining > terminology that will hopefully help everyone get on the same page [1]. > > That said, I know Ben is against creating name spaces on the Red Hat Registry > like aep3_beta and rhel_demos_fred_johnson_is_awesome, etc. I concur. That > said, with demos, I don't see any sane way other than something like > projectatomic_demos, unless you can create another layer in DockerHub's > infrastructure? Something like projectatomic/demos/demo1 would be awesome, I > just don't know if you can do that? > > My 2c. I have the same pain with the Red Hat Registry. Since by nature, I am > dealing with "the suits", I need to use RHEL images, and I can't put my demos > on DockerHub :-( Hence, I am in the business of distributing only > Dockerfiles on GitHub for now [2]., though I would love to be able to > contribute to your demo area with "some" CentOS demos too (there are certain > things that I really need images for and CentOS is my closest fall back)... > > [1]: > http://developerblog.redhat.com/2016/01/13/a-practical-introduction-to-docker-container-terminology/ > [2]: https://github.com/fatherlinux/container-supply-chain > > Best Regards > Scott M > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Josh Berkus" <[email protected]> >> To: "container-tools" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 2:28:39 PM >> Subject: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images >> >> Under docker.io/projectatomic it would be nice to have some kind of >> namespacing for "demo" containers which aren't regarded as >> production-quality. Since I'm already generating these, I'd like to >> create one real soon. >> >> Thoughts on how we want to do that? A "demo" prefix? Or something >> else? >> >> -- >> -- >> Josh Berkus >> Project Atomic >> Red Hat OSAS >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Container-tools mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools >> -- Dirk Herrmann Principal Software Engineer Systems Design & Engineering Red Hat GmbH (Office Munich) Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14 85630 Grasbrunn - Germany Mobile: +49 (0)172 7441607 Email: [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
