Josh, sadly, I think this is still more vapor wear than anything real (correct me if I am wrong Dirk)...
Best Regards Scott M ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Josh Berkus" <[email protected]> > To: "Scott McCarty" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Dirk Herrmann" <[email protected]>, "container-tools" > <[email protected]>, "Ben Breard" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 11:53:52 AM > Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images > > So, how does this work? > > -- > Josh Berkus > Project Atomic > Red Hat > > (apologies for top-posting, RH Zimbra is to blame) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott McCarty" <[email protected]> > To: "Dirk Herrmann" <[email protected]> > Cc: "container-tools" <[email protected]>, "Ben Breard" > <[email protected]>, "Josh Berkus" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 1:59:06 PM > Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images > > Awesome, that would be great!!! Then I could have demo images built > on RHEL and still share them with the world. Novel concept for > winning market share ;-) > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dirk Herrmann" <[email protected]> > > To: "Scott McCarty" <[email protected]>, "Josh Berkus" > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: "container-tools" <[email protected]>, "Ben Breard" > > <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 2:12:24 AM > > Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images > > > > As part of current Red Hat Hub investigation / spike efforts I've > > added > > a card that each registered user of our registry should have its > > own > > namespace, maybe below an other namespace. By default only visible > > to > > the user himself but also allowing sharing the images inside with > > others > > / all. Not discussed with any of the owners yet, just added the > > card > > to > > avoid that it gets lost. > > > > If not possible maybe as a dedicated registry (OpenShift Online > > similar > > to the ISV registry?) under our federated index including links and > > pointers from related product related WebUI (Red Hat Hub) meta > > information pages (sthg like "...if you're using this beautiful XYZ > > image you might want to check out this beautiful demo using this > > product > > created by user XYZ..."). The idea behind was Scott's request to > > make > > demo images available to a broader community but hosted under the > > Red > > Hat umbrella and not somewhere outside (DockerHub or similar). > > > > Dirk > > > > On 03/03/2016 08:35 PM, Scott McCarty wrote: > > > So, I don't have a massive horse in this race, but I will say it > > > keeps coming up all over Red Hat. Because of this, I created an > > > article defining terminology that will hopefully help everyone > > > get > > > on the same page [1]. > > > > > > That said, I know Ben is against creating name spaces on the Red > > > Hat Registry like aep3_beta and > > > rhel_demos_fred_johnson_is_awesome, etc. I concur. That said, > > > with > > > demos, I don't see any sane way other than something like > > > projectatomic_demos, unless you can create another layer in > > > DockerHub's infrastructure? Something like > > > projectatomic/demos/demo1 would be awesome, I just don't know if > > > you can do that? > > > > > > My 2c. I have the same pain with the Red Hat Registry. Since by > > > nature, I am dealing with "the suits", I need to use RHEL images, > > > and I can't put my demos on DockerHub :-( Hence, I am in the > > > business of distributing only Dockerfiles on GitHub for now [2]., > > > though I would love to be able to contribute to your demo area > > > with "some" CentOS demos too (there are certain things that I > > > really need images for and CentOS is my closest fall back)... > > > > > > [1]: > > > http://developerblog.redhat.com/2016/01/13/a-practical-introduction-to-docker-container-terminology/ > > > [2]: https://github.com/fatherlinux/container-supply-chain > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Scott M > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Josh Berkus" <[email protected]> > > >> To: "container-tools" <[email protected]> > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 2:28:39 PM > > >> Subject: [Container-tools] Namespace for demo images > > >> > > >> Under docker.io/projectatomic it would be nice to have some kind > > >> of > > >> namespacing for "demo" containers which aren't regarded as > > >> production-quality. Since I'm already generating these, I'd > > >> like > > >> to > > >> create one real soon. > > >> > > >> Thoughts on how we want to do that? A "demo" prefix? Or > > >> something > > >> else? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> -- > > >> Josh Berkus > > >> Project Atomic > > >> Red Hat OSAS > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Container-tools mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools > > >> > > > > -- > > Dirk Herrmann > > Principal Software Engineer > > Systems Design & Engineering > > > > Red Hat GmbH (Office Munich) > > Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14 > > 85630 Grasbrunn - Germany > > > > Mobile: +49 (0)172 7441607 > > Email: [email protected] > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: > > Grasbrunn, > > Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, > > Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael > > Cunningham, > > Michael O'Neill > > > > > > > > -- > Scott McCarty, RHCA > Technical Product Marketing: Containers > Email: [email protected] > Phone: 312-660-3535 > Cell: 330-807-1043 > Web: http://crunchtools.com > > Containerizing? Why does the user space matter? http://red.ht/1Kl0mpx > -- Scott McCarty, RHCA Technical Product Marketing: Containers Email: [email protected] Phone: 312-660-3535 Cell: 330-807-1043 Web: http://crunchtools.com Containerizing? Why does the user space matter? http://red.ht/1Kl0mpx _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
