What plans do we have to integrate openshift2nulecule in to OpenShift itself (AFAIK this is the "export" feature).
On 9 March 2016 at 14:16, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote: >> >> After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I >> had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as >> container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package. > > > We need both. The reason is we have users for both. For example Atomic App > have both. We have it in Fedora and EPEL. > > >> I'm interested in your thoughts about this. >> >> Advantages: >> - separate release cycle from ADB >> - no more issues with dependencies >> - consistent interface of atomic cli for the end user. >> >> >> Disadvantages: >> - might require specifying more command line options >> - all exported files are going to be owned by root >> - Extra docker image need to be pulled which is larger than rpm package >> (this will be one time download) >> >> >> [1] >> >> https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/279#issuecomment-193841621 >> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/openshift2nulecule/issues/21 >> [3] https://github.com/projectatomic/openshift2nulecule/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Container-tools mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools > > > _______________________________________________ > Container-tools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
